Working models and relationship quality in dating couples Completely free text sex chats for any age
This study examines how patterns of decision-making in relationships are associated with other relationship characteristics, including relationship quality, commitment, and extra-dyadic involvement.
Stanley, Rhoades, and Markman (2006) have put forth a model of explaining risks related to how relationship transitions occur.
Secure people understand relationships better; they know what ingredients go into a well-functioning relationship and are adept at providing and receiving interpersonal support.
For example, when a secure person is upset, he/she feels comfortable turning to his/her partner for emotional comfort and accepts that they are each dependent on each other for assistance as problems arise.
Dissertations Using the Adult Attachment Scale Below is a list of dissertations using the AAS.
The full version of these dissertations can be found using Pro Quest.
We show that Avoidance is better conceptualized as Nurturance/Love within an evolved systems perspective on personality, and that the Anxiety dimension in infancy measures trust in the face of threat based on experience. (2016) Love, Trust, and Evolution: Nurturance/Love and Trust as Two Independent Attachment Systems Underlying Intimate Relationships.
The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale.
It measures adult attachment styles named "Secure", "Anxious" and "Avoidant", defined as: • Secure = high scores on Close and Depend subscales, low score on Anxiety subscale • Anxious = high score on Anxiety subscale, moderate scores on Close and Depend subscales • Avoidant = low scores on Close, Depend, and Anxiety subscales The 18 items that compromise the measure are as follows: Note: (S)= Secure, (Av)= Avoidant, (Ax)= Anxious/Ambivalent Authors Nancy L. Read Reliability and Validity Collins & Read (1990) reported Cronbach's alpha coefficients of .69 for Close, .75 for Depend, and .72 for Anxiety.
These two dimensions have important differences, including different evolutionary functions and phylogeny, as well as different emotions, brain mechanisms, and patterns of sex differences and heritability.
We used two versions of the Experiences in Close Relationships Survey yielding measures of Anxiety and Avoidance, and the Interpersonal Adjective Scale-Revised-Big 5, the latter chosen because it measures Nurturance/Love in a manner consistent with an evolutionary perspective on close relationships. Results supported the hypotheses of a strong negative association between Nurturance/Love and Avoidance as measured by the ECR and no association between Nurturance/Love and Anxiety as measured by the ECR.